Chachapoyas area of \u200b\u200binfluence of the famous men of culture Sachapuyas (sacha: mountain, and puya: fog), creators of the imposing citadel of Cuélap, Big Pajatén and other cities that make up a large confederation of small kingdoms before the Incas .
The Chachapoyas were composed of various ethnic kin, as well as by various forms of language, probably unrelated to each other but different from the Quechua. Some people like Bandelier (1907.1940) and Middenfordf (1893.95) highlight the presence of linguistic ingredients Colla or Aymara origin in the modalities of the language spoken in the region of Chachapoyas.
According Kauffman Doig, Chachapoyas culture had its beginnings in
Prior to Chachapoyas, at least for more than 7,000 years, their territory was already traveled by man as evidenced by the presence of witnesses rock (Good and Lozano 1982; Gamonal 1981 ; Miasta 1979), which according to Kauffman continue exercising artistic expression even in times of the Incas.
There is also evidence for preChachapoyas flowering times of the first stage of the ancient civilization of Peru, an example is given in Bagua pottery analyzed by Ruth Shady (1971), as well as through large monoliths reminiscent Chavin and another close to those of Kunturwasi (Gamon 1982, 1983, Kauffman and Gamonal 1989).
Chachapoyas area of \u200b\u200binfluence of the famous men of culture Sachapuyas (sacha: mountain, and puya: fog), creators of the imposing citadel of Kuelap, the great Pajatén and other cities that make up a large confederation small kingdoms before the Incas.
The Chachapoyas were composed of various ethnic kin, as well as by various forms of language, probably unrelated to each other but different from the Quechua. Some people like Bandelier (1907.1940) and Middenfordf (1893.95) highlight the presence of linguistic ingredients Colla or Aymara origin in the modalities of the language spoken in the region of Chachapoyas.
According to Kauffman Doig, Chachapoyas culture had its beginnings in
Archaeologists Henry and Paul Reichler (Reichle and Reichle 1950) proposed to be divided into three periods the archaeological process of Chachapoyas culture: Cuélap, Chipuric and Revash.
Prior to Chachapoyas, at least for more than 7,000 years, their territory was already traversed by the man as evidenced by the presence of witnesses rock (Good and Lozano 1982; Gamonal 1981 ; Miasta 1979), which according to this expression Kauffman Continuation of exercise in artistic Incan times.
There is also evidence for preChachapoyas flowering times of the first stage of the ancient civilization of Peru, an example is given in Bagua pottery analyzed by Ruth Said (1971), and also by large monoliths reminiscent Chavín and another close to those of Kunturwasi (Gamon 1982, 1983, Kauffman and Gamon 1989).
are several researchers, who have studied architecture Chachapoyas. One of the great exponents are architectural ensembles Cuélap (Narváez 1996-97), Olan, Yálape, Purunllacta (renamed the Savoy as "Gran Vilaya"), Pajatén (Bonavia 1968, Kauffmann Doig 1980, 1984, 2000). Cuélap, extends for 600 meters
For ceramics, the Chachapoyas is rough both in terms of its bill as decoration. The decorative elements are practically limited to grounds laced or "hatched." Meter Lerma (1986) proposed that these are of Amazonian origin. In any case, this would be the only pattern from the Amazon
Queros or ceremonial vessels wood, as quipus, are in turn samples the Inka presence in the territory of the Chachapoyas. This is also attested by the ruins of Inca bill discussed Cochabamba (Schjellerup 1984), and also by the testimonies of imperial Inca and Inca pottery as those in provincial and elsewhere Pajatén Chachapoyas Utcubamba Basin (Kauffman Doig 1996).
The archaeologist s Henry and Paul Reichler (Reichle and Reichle 1950) proposed to be divided into three periods the archaeological process of culture Chachapoyas: Cuélap, Chipuric and Revash. Other studies have the Ruth Shady (1971), already mentioned above lines, which analyzed ceramics from Bagua, studies have also Ruíz Estrada (1972), who analyzed the pottery from Cuélap, which is what I will explain below
Ruiz Estrada, carried out excavations at the farm Cuélap, and the study of pottery found, enabled him to establish a relative timing sequence is that the earliest pottery would be Cancharín phase, which corresponds to the Early Intermediate Period; followed Pumahuanchina phase, which corresponds to the Horizon Middle phase continues Kuelap, located between the Middle Horizon Period Late Intermediate same finally set the stage in four Kuelap Inca l Cuelap manifestations occur associated with Inca pottery.
Cancharín In phase can be distinguished mainly by the presence of pottery types and Kuelap Kuelap Pulido Smooth Striated, which serve as diagnostic types.
differentiable Pumahuanchina mainly by the appearance of pottery painted Cuelap Pulido, associated with pottery Cajamarca III. Cuelap phase, is distinguished primarily by the presence of pottery types Culpa Painted Smooth A, B and C. In the last phase of secular gum, Kuelap Inca, continue Cuelap types, but appears as a new type Cuelap Painted pottery typically applied and Inca.
Ruíz, before his ecuencia s ruling, concluded, that before the call was built Kuelap Fortress had h uman groups established in the same place, and probably the building of the buildings that today are seen as phase Cuelap, given the association of the pottery types of this phase of the site buildings.
Him porte de Ruiz, is that was who first made an archaeological survey in Cuelap which gave its stylistic sequences based on ceramics.
types studied pottery with all its features and associations. And concludes that there is diffusion of ceramic items to Kuelap Cajamarca, ostensible influenced area in the development phase pottery from Pumahuanchina. According to Ruiz's another case, and what was the Huari pottery.
Other studies and research, we have Abel Ocampo (1982), conducted a study descriptive Chivane or monument located in Chachapoyas territory but raised prior to the culture of this name corresponds to the time of the early or formative expression of the civilization of Peru, according to Kauffman Doig.
Coc habamba other extreme forms: the important administrative center built during the Inca Empire was visited by Julio César Tello and has been described by Inge Schjellerup (1984). On the ruins of Pajatén is a descriptive study published by Duccio Bonavia (1968). For his part, Keith Mascutt (1 998) as well as Federico Kauffman Doig (1996), are the authors of studies l set on to Chachapoyas.
● Cuélap: has received Louis Langlois studies do (in the thirties), Ruiz Estrada, as well as Federico Kauffman, among other lines mentioned above.
Cuélap, rose aa Utcubamba the left bank, and consists of a huge platform that crowns the crest of a limestone hill known as the Jimmy
so far not been possible to determine at what stage of their development up Cuélap Chachapoyas. But some researchers as Kauffman (1996), give the date of 1000 for e Christian ra.
● Pajatén: Rec Bonavía IBIO important studies (1968), also G. Savoy in the late seventies.
Pajatén The ruins, offers two important aspects for consideration: one relates to its architectural peculiarities, the other the world of its iconography. Have circular buildings mod or "turrets" on different levels but within walking distance.
According Bonavia (1968), the 16 towers spread over an area slightly larger than one hectare, corresponding to the area deforested by
For iconographic motifs, are high reliefs and drawings (figures), thus using the technique of expressing lines by stones protrude rig construction. There geo-metric designs, mainly fretwork. There are heads of human figures. We present ation decor on the floors of enclosures, in some cases.
According to Kauffman Doig, the iconography in Pajaten, is divided into three categories:
● Category One: Reasons biomorphs (anthropomorphic and zoomorphic). With sketchy lines and angular. The characters are seated in front, with legs bent and open. are beings on ATURAL of sex with female bulging belly.
● second category are: geometric motifs. Protruding frets and stepped motifs and horizontal.
● Category Three: Reasons semi-abstract. Stellate figures, geometric and conventional present in buildings.
Other sites you
With reference to the burial patterns, Kauffman refers to two burial patterns for famous people: the mausoleum (pucullo or Chullpa), and the sarcophagus or purun-machu. Is Carajía, which houses the sarcophagus Chachapoyas more poise. These sarcophagi are Empla zados on top of a cliff which drops vertically.
The sar cófagos of Chachapoyas : According to Kauffman Doig, are made of a clay cap which houses a crouching mummy, wrapped in cloth and sitting on your ass. Various objects such as ceramic vessels and utensils used in textile art displayed around the dead, mummified. According to Kauffman capsules are rare in Chachapoyas burial offerings, as happens in the graves and coastal mountain range, which is in contradiction with n monumental character and sumptuous sarcophagus. The material used in the manufacture of the sarcophagus was mainly clay cream shade.
According to Kauffman Doig (1989), the diversity of forms that have the sarcophagi Chachapoyas, including its size, could be explained as arising in the intention to emphasize hierarchical ADOS gr. And mentioned that apart from the sarcophagi bear human traits, appears at the same time the outline of a phallus. And the condition ambivalent, showing conspicuous sarcophagi s, remember you can also be observed in the monoliths Recuay, Aija, of the Merced
Besides Carajía stone sarcophagi, in which the Group 1 is the highest one is known, the integrated originally eight sarcophagi, in which all were painted with motifs based on lines drawn in two shades of red. The s arcófagos Crujía Group 1 finish in the top section and a tip No, this mask on his head. Other sarcophagi: the Solmal, Yambata , Chipuric, Liege, San Antonio , Tingorbamba, among others.
the mausoleums of the Chachapoyas: The mausoleums Chachapoyas, could have emerged as forms of pattern or pucullo chullpa . In this regard we have studies by Charles Wiener (1884), poster archaeologists iormente Henry and Paul Reichler (1950) analyzed the content of one of the mausoleums viewed by Wiener, and removed the debris from the roof of one of them had collapsed. Kauffman Doig (1989.1993), was able to identify and analyze various mausoleums: Tingomarca, Ochino, Peña de Tuenter, Guanglic,
The mausoleums Chachapoyas consists of burial chambers built of stone. Its walls were plastered, and in some cases painted with magic-religious figures, and also decorated with magic-religious representations using part of it as building material s walls, setting off the surface of the wall stones to form figures.
One of the ma usoleos more representative of the Chachapoyas culture is Pinchudos o The Pucullos, which are located near the ruins of Pajaten. Five are the mausoleums that make up the group the group d and The Pinchudos, plus two that are presented in address west of that parcel. Are treated rectangular buildings as well as half-moon, built with stone walls, and reach up to more than 4m high and
Kauffman Doig ( 1996.1997) , mentions that the Chachapoyas were eminent weavers, and decorated with figures mates pyrography, carving wood and stone, leaving paint mural.